On the equivalence of coalitional and individual strategy-proofness properties
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we introduce a su¢ cient condition on the domain of admissible preferences of a social choice mechanism under which the properties of individual and coalitional strategyproofness are equivalent. Then, we illustrate the usefulness of this general result in the case where a xed budget has to be allocated among several pure public goods. Université de Toulouse 1, Gremaq and Idei, France ([email protected]) yUniversité de Toulouse 1, Gremaq, France and Université Catholique de Louvain, Core, Belgium ([email protected]).
منابع مشابه
Unimodal Domains, Anti-exchange Properties, and Coalitional Strategy-proofness of Voting Rules
It is shown that simple and coalitional strategy-proofness of a voting rule on the full unimodal domain of a convex idempotent interval space (X, I) are equivalent properties if (X, I) satisfies interval anti-exchange, a basic property also shared by a large class of convex geometries including -but not reducing totrees and linear geometries. Therefore, strategy-proof location problems in a vas...
متن کاملCoalitional unanimity versus strategy-proofness in coalition formation problems
This paper examines coalition formation problems from the viewpoint of mechanism design. We consider the case where (i) the list of feasible coalitions (those coalitions which are permitted to form) is given in advance; and (ii) each individual’s preference is a ranking over those feasible coalitions which include this individual. We are interested in requiring the mechanism to guarantee each c...
متن کاملSome Results for Impossibility Theorems of Social Welfare Function and Social Choice Function
We present some results on social welfare function and social choice function. First, we replace weak Pareto principle of Arrow’s axioms with strong Pareto principle, and then show that assuming unrestricted domain property, independence of irrelevant alternatives and strong Pareto principle on a social welfare function in Arrow’s sense leads to the existence of first to nth commanders whose st...
متن کاملGeneralized monotonicity and strategy−proofness for non−resolute social choice correspondences
Recently there are several works which analyzed the strategy−proofness of non−resolute social choice rules such as Duggan and Schwartz (2000) and Ching and Zhou (2001). In these analyses it was assumed that individual preferences are linear, that is, they excluded indifference from individual preferences. We present an analysis of the strategy−proofness of non−resolute social choice rules when ...
متن کاملCoalitional Strategy-Proofness in Economies with Single-Dipped Preferences and the Assignment of an Indivisible Object
We study two allocation models. In the first model, we consider the problem of allocating an infinitely divisible commodity among agents with single-dipped preferences. In the second model, a degenerate case of the first one, we study the allocation of an indivisible object to a group of agents. Our main result is the characterization of the class of Pareto optimal and coalitionally strategy-pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 33 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009